That does not sound like such a big difference, but the high viscosity of the molasses was a major factor for rescue work."
"Based on our data, it's possible the viscosity of the molasses increased by a factor of four or more due to that drop in temperature. "Temperatures dipped just below freezing the night following the accident," aerospace engineer and fluid dynamicist Nicole Sharp, lead author of the study, told Live Science. To explore the physics behind the flood – how it moved so quickly and caused so much damage – researchers combed hundreds of pages of historical accounts and contemporary newspaper articles, studied century-old maps of buildings in the area, and requested historic data from the National Weather Service. The wave moved through the neighborhood at more than 50 feet per second. 15, 1919, when a giant storage tank – 50 feet tall and 90 feet wide – collapsed on Boston's waterfront at the Purity Distilling Co., releasing more than 2.3 million gallons of molasses into Boston's North End. The flood began shortly after 12:40 pm local time on Jan. Human beings – men and women – suffered likewise."īut how, exactly, did the sticky, sweet substance commonly found in cookies turn so deadly? That's the question researchers set out to answer in a new study presented last week at the annual meeting of the American Physical Society's Division of Fluid Dynamics in Portland, Ore. The more they struggled, the deeper in the mess they were ensnared. Horses died like so many flies on sticky fly-paper.
"Only an upheaval, a thrashing about in the sticky mass, showed where any life was. Here and there struggled a form – whether it was animal or human being was impossible to tell," the Boston Post reported at the time. "Molasses, waist deep, covered the street and swirled and bubbled about the wreckage.
#BOSTON MOLASSES FLOOD TRIAL MOVIE#
The deadly 25-foot wave of molasses that flowed through Boston's North End, flattening buildings in its wake, may sound like a scenario in a science fiction movie – but for the 21 people killed and 150 injured in the flood, the nightmarish scene was very real. That could stop the meltdown, if not the shutdown.Īfter nearly one hundred years, scientists have come up with an explanation for one of history's strangest disasters: the Great Molasses Flood of 1919. The least lawmakers can do is look the part, they argue.
#BOSTON MOLASSES FLOOD TRIAL CODE#
Schumer did not drop the dress code for staffers on the Senate floor, few enter the chamber and the standards in the hallways have already changed.)But for others, there’s a feeling that from schools to churches to Congress, America is dropping the standards that cultivate – and earn – respect. Many say such diversity makes for better policymaking, as we wrote about last year. (Though Mr. Journalists and staffers have happily followed suit. For some, relaxing dress codes – which are expensive to follow, particularly for young staffers – is a step toward greater equity, enabling people from a wider range of socioeconomic backgrounds to work on the Hill. Schumer – wore dress sneakers to the Oval Office. Congressional leaders sparked controversy this spring when all but one of them – Mr. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania has frequently sported hoodies and shorts since his return from being treated for clinical depression, though he would vote from the edge of the Senate floor so as not to break the unwritten rules. There is a language, choreography, and, yes, costumes. The unwritten rules of congressional theater were being challenged well before Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer issued his edict Friday.Flip-flops, wigs, and sweaty gym shirts had already made Senate appearances. It gets to standards, and tone, and trust.So much of Congress is theater. senators can wear whatever they want on the Senate floor, sparking an uproar. Wait, the government is about to shut down, and we’re arguing about outfits?But this is about something deeper than a dress code.
0 kommentar(er)
